EPS has revolutionised the way growers and manufacturers have packaged their products, throughout New Zealand and across the world. This clean, lightweight and cost effective packaging medium has entrenched itself in the market place.
It is the best all-round transportable protection for goods which are fragile and/or require the product to retain its freshness throughout its journey, whether to a local or international destination.
In fact EPS is so versatile it can be moulded to shape for standard and large quantity items such as fish and fruit boxes, whiteware packaging etc, or can be cut from large blocks and hot wire cut to any shape or design.
This makes it the ideal choice for the smaller manufacturer producing niche market items. This factor has particular relevance for NZ conditions, where short run manufacturing is a common practice owing to our small economy. It should also be noted that since the introduction of EPS for packaging the cost of packaging and transportation of these goods has been significantly reduced. This is because the energy required to manufacture and transport EPS is much less than conventional materials such as timber, straw, cork or cardboard. Other positive attributes are the options available for recycling EPS packaging. Further details can be found in the link to the right for EPS and the Environment.
EPS is unaffected by water, most acids and alkali solutions. If EPS has to be brought into contact with substances of unknown composition, the reaction of the material should first be checked.
The best way of doing this is to age a piece of EPS in close contact with the other material and observe what happens. The duration of the experiment can be reduced by raising the temperature.
The table below depicts the effect of a few common chemicals & solvents when placed in contact with EPS.
Chemical Resistance of Expanded Polystyrene |
|
| Chemical or Solvent | |
| Salt solution (seawater) |
+ |
| Soaps and wetting agent solutions |
+ |
| Bleaching agent solutions, e.g. sodium hypochlorite, chlorine water and hydrogen peroxide |
+ |
| Dilute acids |
+ |
| Hydrochloric acid, 35%, nitric acid up to 50% |
+ |
| Anhydrous acids, e.g. fuming sulphuric acid, 100% formic acid |
- |
| Caustic soda and caustic potash solutions. ammonia water |
+ |
| Organic solvents such as acetone, ethyl acetate, benzene, xylene, paint thinners and trichloroethylene |
- |
| Saturated aliphatic hydrocarbons, surgical spirit, white spirit |
- |
| Paraffin oil, vaseline |
+- |
| Diesel fuel |
- |
| Engine fuels (normal- and super grade petrol) |
- |
| Alcohols, e.g. methanol and ethanol |
+- |
| Silicone fluids |
+ |
|
+ resistant: the foam is not attacked even after a long time + - limited resistance: the foam may shrink after prolonged exposure to the chemical, or its surface may be attacked - not resistant: the foam shrivels up more or less quickly or is dissolved |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Because of its excellent physical and chemical properties EPS offers the following advantages when used as a packaging material.
Insulated packaging is required whenever the temperature of the contents must be maintained above or below the ambient temperature, depending on the nature of the product, e.g. hot foods, ice cream and fresh seafoods, or pharmaceuticals.
These demands can be met by materials with a low thermal conductivity. This is a measure for the heat flow over a given temperature gradient under standard conditions (DIN 52612). It can be seen from the table below that the average thermal conductivity of expanded polystyrene is very much less than that of compact plastics.
In other words, expanded polystyrene is the ideal material for insulated packaging.
If the thermal conductivity and the transportation and storage conditions are known, polystyrene insulated packaging can be designed for a given application.
Contents will maintain desired condition longer by:

One of the key functions of packaging is to protect the contents from external impact. In this area expanded polystyrene is unsurpassed.
As seen in the table below, the value quoted for e indicates the potential energy of a dynamic load that must be applied to a cushioning material to obtain a given value of C.
It can be seen from this table that polystyrene foam is the best shock absorbing material of all, i.e. it has the lowest value of C.
Table of Impact Protection for Sample Materials
| Material Substance |
Density e Kg/m3 |
Cushioning factor C* - |
Specific potential energy e* cN.cm/cm3 |
| PE expanded beads |
30 |
3.5 | 500 |
| PUR soft polyether foams | 30 | 3.1 | 125 |
| PUR soft polyester foams | 30 | 3.3 | 200 |
| PUR semi-hard | 30 | 2.8 | 350 |
| PS loose-fill material | 8 | 4 | 400 |
| Foam rubber* | 200 | 4.3 | 350 |
| Coconut fibres* rubberized | 80 | 3.8 | 70 |
| Corrugated board* single corrugation | 800 g/m2 | 2.4 | 530 |
| Corrugated board* twin -corrugation | 1050 g/m2 | 2.6 | 800 |
| Air, 1 bar | 1.29 | 5.11 | 650 |
The following points must be observed in the design of polystyrene packaging (in addition to ensuring that the compressive strength lies above the maximum permissible compressive load).
The strength of EPS is completely retained even on direct contact with water. This demonstrates that moulded EPS shapes ensure secure and stable stacks in all stages of transportation, even under severe conditions.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |





